Yup Just a fun loving group 
been parting for centries and humanity foots the bill 
This site I have listed has some good information about this wild bunch of partiers. 
I find the Masons obsession with geometry to be most curious 
http://pages.prodigy.net/markrm/satanicland.html 

Just in case there are any left who can trample through the mason onslaught 


quote: Originally posted by TheObserver 
quote: Originally posted by Bondi 
I don't mean to be rude but this chap has even tried to blame the application of geomoetry 
in nucluar fision/fusion on Freemasonry, apparently it has got nothing to do with science
 or the fact it wont work otherwise,
  the rods are placed in such a way because of Freemasonry. 

I`m not a nuclear expert are you? Maybe it is maybe it isn`t. I`m interested to hear every
 side of a story and am even open to extreme possibilities, aren`t you? 

Actually, my son is (was) a Navy nuke (nuclear technician) and he's now in college to 
become an aerospace engineer. I showed him the page (after giggling madly at the ridiculous
 assertion) and he just guffawed loudly and said some rather rude things about the level of
  intelligence (and knowledge of nuclear reactors) of the website that made that assertion. 

His expert opinion boils down to "stupidest thing I ever saw." 

So there you have it, from someone who does know. 




I guess it is mea culpa that he included nuclear reactions in his theory. 
If I had kept silent about the Einstein he wouldn?t came up with this nonsensical idea.



Super Geometry

quote: Originally posted by Byrd 
quote: Originally posted by TheObserver 
quote: Originally posted by Bondi 
I don't mean to be rude but this chap has even tried to blame the application of geomoetry
 in nucluar fision/fusion on Freemasonry, apparently it has got nothing to do with science or the fact it wont work otherwise, the rods are placed in such a way because of Freemasonry. 

I`m not a nuclear expert are you? Maybe it is maybe it isn`t. I`m interested to hear every 
side of a story and am even open to extreme possibilities, aren`t you? 

Actually, my son is (was) a Navy nuke (nuclear technician) and he's now in college to 
become an aerospace engineer. I showed him the page 
(after giggling madly at the ridiculous assertion) and he just guffawed loudly and said 
some rather rude things about the level of intelligence (and knowledge of nuclear reactors) of the website that made that assertion. 

His expert opinion boils down to "stupidest thing I ever saw." 

So there you have it, from someone who does know. 


I realy thought it was a somewhat known Fact- 

NUCLEAR POWER WORKS BECAUSE OF GEOMETRY..... 

VALIDATION OF BATAN-3DIFF CODE ON 3-D MODEL OF IAEA 10MWTH 
BENCHMARK CORE FOR THE PARTIALLY-INSERTED CONTROL RODS. 
Benchmark calculations using Batan?s standard 3-D multigroup diffusion code, Batan-3DIFF, 
have been conducted on 3-D model of the IAEA 10 MWth Benchmark Core. 
The validation work included the reactivity worth of the partially-inserted control rods,
 the change of the power peaking factor and the change of the axial power density profile 
 and shift. This work was done to investigate the code capability to treat the partially 
 insertion of control rod by using the diffusion method combined with internal boundary 
 conditions and to support the safety analyses for the future high loading silicide fuel 
 of the RSG-GAS reactor.
  The benchmark procedure, data and parameters to be calculated and compared are taken 
	from IAEA-TECDOC-643. The core is a typical 10 MWth Material Testing Reactor (MTR) type
	 with low enrichment uranium (LEU). The WIMS/D4 code was used to obtain the group 
	 constants for all core material in five energy groups with the multiplate option. 
	 The 3-D model (X-Y-Z geometry), five-group diffusion constants and the implementation of
	  the dirty blackness coefficient for the internal boundary conditions were adopted 
		in these calculations using Batan-3DIFF code.
		 For all calculated parameters, the code gives very satisfactory results. 


In this case, the fully inserted and fully withdrawn control rod configuration could be 
treated in 2-D reactor geometry and solved with Batan-2DIFF without sacrificing the 
				accuracy. 


NO Comment needed 

http://www.batan.go.id/pustaka/J-atom/A252799/tagor.htm 

I am of the opinion that certain geometrical formations cause certain vibrational effects
 - that is my reference to the rods 

Can"t really "Blame" geometry or Sacred Geometry either